This is an individual post from E Pluribus Unum
There's more on the main page.


DoJ concocts new, improved rationale for warrantless wiretapping

The best defense is a good offense. Are you surprised?

"Because the President has determined that the NSA activities are necessary to the defense of the United States from a subsequent terrorist attack in the armed conflict with al Qaeda, FISA would impermissibly interfere with the President’s most solemn constitutional obligation – to defend the United States against foreign attack."
So, in short, FISA is unconsitutional, not Bush's warrantless wiretapping.

But Al Gore has already thought about this and formulates the central question that is on everybody's mind:

Can it be true that any president really has such powers under our Constitution? If the answer is "yes" then under the theory by which these acts are committed, are there any acts that can on their face be prohibited? If the President has the inherent authority to eavesdrop, imprison citizens on his own declaration, kidnap and torture, then what can't he do?
According to Al Gonzalez, the answer is apparently "Nothing."

We'll see them all in court.

(HT to Glenn Greenwald)


Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Full Feed RSS

Creative Commons LicenseThis weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2