Random Thoughts: What Democrats and Republicans do
It occurs to me:
- If I'm John McCain, wouldn't I be (at least privately) bitter about the recent treatment I got from Bush?
Think about it: McCain campaigns for Bush when it really counts, he backs Bush's Iraq policy, he virtually becomes a Bush clone on gay rights and abortion, and so forth. Then, when McCain's signature anti-torture amendment passes (despite Cheney's opposition), Bush reluctantly gives in, but not until issuing a statement saying that none the restrictions apply to the Chief Executive if he so chooses.McCain is still the toast of the traditional media, but (to me) he looks like Bush's butt-boy now. Hey John -- was it worth it? Do you really think this will get you the nomination in '08?
- Larry Sabato thinks the Republican nomination for President in '08 is dangerously wide-open at this time.
As for me, I think it doesn't matter who they nominate. The party's policies on tax-cuts (who doesn't want one?), culture-wars (the queers are coming for your children!), and terrorism (we're all gonna die unless you vote for me) are enough to give any Republican nominee an advantage from the get-go. The Democrats, OTOH, usually wait until a nominee emerges before crafting party policy.Despite that, Sabato also believes that after eight years of Bush, the country will be ready for a change. Again, I disagree. In 1988, the people voted for Bush 41 after eight years of Reagan. And the fact that his opponent was Michael Dukakis probably only reinforces my point.
- In order to start winning elections again, the Democrats must again invoke the memory and attitude of FDR.
I don't mean they campaign on bringing back "big government." I mean that the Dems must remind people that the only thing they have to fear is fear itself.Bush and the Republicans have managed to continue to win elections by relying on a climate of fear and hysteria. I hope that more than one future historian will encapsulate this decade by recalling this recent exchange in the US Senate:
“None of your civil liberties matter much after you’re dead,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), a former judge and close ally of the president who sits on the Judiciary Committee.
I say I hope that becomes the indelible memory, but I wonder sometimes. Are Democrats capable of reminding people that we have a tradition of brave and resolute behavior in the face of threats from the outside world? Can people be motivated by a clarion call for the protection of their own civil liberties?“Give me liberty or give me death,” said Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), who has led a bipartisan filibuster against a reauthorization of the Patriot Act.
Or will people continue to react to the nightmares, terrors and hysteria whipped up by Bush's Republicans?

Comments
"Are Democrats capable of reminding people that we have a tradition of brave and resolute behavior in the face of threats from the outside world...Or will people continue to react to the nightmares, terrors and hysteria whipped up by Bush's Republicans?"
Ya know, in spite of their driving ambition to undermine the social compact (some semblance of meritocracy and safety from institutional malfeasance), their disgusting pretense of purer motives to govern and their utter incompetence at governing at all (not surprising since their one apparent honesty in a sh*tstorm of deception is their admission that they don’t believe in government), Republican fear-mongering is the salient reason why they should be sent to the political wilderness until they are reformed through new leadership.
Although it is said that people are like sheep, they are actually more like dogs, genetically and behaviorally. They can be led (trained, if you will) based upon what their leaders instill in their hearts and minds. Train dogs through fear, intimidation and negative reinforcement and you get a neurotic dog with assorted behavioral problems. Train them with love and positive reinforcement and you get a better-adjusted animal (as most “authoritative” parents know, it’s generally the same with human animals).
Lead people by appealing to their sense of community and personal honor and you get one sort of culture, lead them by appealing to their fear and resentment and you get another. Both directions of leadership are self-reinforcing – becoming more morally motivated (selfless) tends to pull people toward greater enlightenment and civilized behavior, while making them more afraid or resentful (self-centered) makes them less thoughtful and more aggressive and intolerant. Ironically, those who are being negatively manipulated are also the least likely to realize that they’re having their psyches shaped by outside forces – they feel too embattled to be truly introspective.
America’s modern golden era of moral aspiration (WWII –through the Civil Rights Movement) was brought about by (mostly Democrat) leaders’ calls to our better angles (e.g., FDR’s “We have nothing to fear” to JFK’s “Ask not what your country can do for you…”). It was ended by a string of (mostly Republican) leaders’ appeals to fear (The Domino Theory to The War on Terror) and resentment (of liberals, “Welfare Queens” and now gays who want to marry).
Republican stock-in-trade is appealing to fear (chiefly fear of the “other”) and resentment (“they’re takin’ my job, my gun, my big-block, my flag, my ceremony,” etc.) or some combination of the two (twofer: “they’re takin’ my taxes and giving them to that brown-skinned “other”). The followers’ present day capitulation to leadership-inspired fear manifests itself in honest-to-God calls to execute their political rivals, in this case those who want to uphold the US Constitution and the rule of law by preventing neo-fascist overreach by the executive branch (making them no better than modern day “Loyalists").
Think about the premeditated evil it takes to purposely inflame racism and retrograde religious belief to pit rural white Americans against their urban, liberal, brown-skinned and/or gay fellow citizens over complete non-issues like gun registration or public prayer and issues of personal conduct like abortion or gay marriage that aren’t anyone else’s goddamn business in the first place. And then think about the traitorousness of scaring Americans into abandoning this county’s founding principles by fanning fears of far-flung bands of (literally) cave-dwelling, stateless lunatics with no mass following and no military capability (especially absurd after enduring a 46-year Cold War with the entire Soviet bloc).
As long as Republicans derive their power by developing and exploiting people’s base animal instincts to divide this country, they are the boils on the ass that is contemporary American politics. And as long as frightened, disgruntled and misled citizens keep voting them into power, this country will continue its descent into darkness.
Posted by: shep
|
January 13, 2006 04:09 PM