This is an individual post from E Pluribus Unum
There's more on the main page.


Gore slams Bush administration on warrantless wiretapping (and more)

Al-Gore-MLK-day.jpg(Click image, left, to watch video excerpts in WMP. Click here to watch in QT.)

Today, the American Constitution Society and the Liberty Coalition hosted a speech by Fmr. Vice Pres. Al Gore at the DAR Hall in Washington. Gore spoke about the limits of executive power, the issue of warrantless monitoring of domestic communications and the authorization of the use of torture in the war against terrorism:

Fear drives out reason. Fear suppresses the politics of discourse and opens the door to the politics of destruction. Justice Brandeis once wrote: "Men feared witches and burnt women."

The founders of our country faced dire threats. If they failed in their endeavors, they would have been hung as traitors. The very existence of our country was at risk.

Yet, in the teeth of those dangers, they insisted on establishing the Bill of Rights.

Is our Congress today in more danger than were their predecessors when the British army was marching on the Capitol? Is the world more dangerous than when we faced an ideological enemy with tens of thousands of missiles poised to be launched against us and annihilate our country at a moment's notice? Is America in more danger now than when we faced worldwide fascism on the march-when our fathers fought and won two World Wars simultaneously?

It is simply an insult to those who came before us and sacrificed so much on our behalf to imply that we have more to be fearful of than they. Yet they faithfully protected our freedoms and now it is up to us to do the same.

And, most remarkable of all, Gore recalled the days when J. Edgar Hoover's FBI put wiretaps on Dr. King:
CIA analysts who strongly disagreed with the White House assertion that Osama bin Laden was linked to Saddam Hussein found themselves under pressure at work and became fearful of losing promotions and salary increases.

Ironically, that is exactly what happened to FBI officials in the 1960s who disagreed with J. Edgar Hoover's view that Dr. King was closely connected to Communists. The head of the FBI's domestic intelligence division said that his effort to tell the truth about King's innocence of the charge resulted in he and his colleagues becoming isolated and pressured. "It was evident that we had to change our ways or we would all be out on the street.... The men and I discussed how to get out of trouble. To be in trouble with Mr. Hoover was a serious matter. These men were trying to buy homes, mortgages on homes, children in school. They lived in fear of getting transferred, losing money on their homes, as they usually did. ... so they wanted another memorandum written to get us out of the trouble that we were in."

The Constitution's framers understood this dilemma as well, as Alexander Hamilton put it, "a power over a man's support is a power over his will." (Federalist No. 73)

Soon, there was no more difference of opinion within the FBI. The false accusation became the unanimous view. In exactly the same way, George Tenet's CIA eventually joined in endorsing a manifestly false view that there was a linkage between al Qaeda and the government of Iraq.

In the words of George Orwell: "We are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield."

I'm sure Republicans (and most shamefully, some weasel-Democrats) as well as the pampered poodles of the punditocracy (who fear losing their book contracts, promotions and access) will blow off the speech because it was given by the "loser" of the 2000 election. And if that's what you're thinking too, then I'm sorry. Because you will miss a chance to hear someone, a not-so-elder statesman, give an insightful speech informed by history and perspective and passion.

Comments

”I'm sure Republicans (and most shamefully, some weasel-Democrats) as well as the pampered poodles of the punditocracy (who fear losing their book contracts, promotions and access) will blow off the speech because it was given by the "loser" of the 2000 election.”

Of course they will. Because for this culture’s competitive elite (politicians, journalists, business executives, etc.) winning is everything. To get where they are most of them decided long ago (consciously or not) that all other “ethics” are secondary. Why else would Democrat-bashing still be traditional journalism’s favorite contact sport? I mean, after more than five years of deciding nothing, in the midst of the most corrupt and incompetent government in American history, why are Democrats still the Sunday morning barking-heads’ favorite whipping boy? It would be laughably absurd if it weren’t so tragically delusive.


Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Full Feed RSS

Creative Commons LicenseThis weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2