Wanker of the Day: Bill Bennett
This, from the Bookie of Virtues:
I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky.
Well.
Now look: I know where he's coming from. He's interpreting a point made by Steven Levitt in his book Freakonomics -- that legalized abortion (in effect) amounts to pre-emptive capital punishment of a lower-class criminal element. [Note: some have extended that argument to say that the Federal government has lost billions of dollars in tax revenues because these fetuses did not come to term and, ahem, pay taxes. One is tempted to say that you can't have it both ways, but I digress...]
Here's the thing: Bennett is entitled to his own opinion but he is not entitled to his own facts.
Steve Sailer had this to say in The American Conservativeof all places:
...[T]he acid test of Levitt’s theory is this: did the first New, Improved Generation culled by legalized abortion actually grow up to be more lawful teenagers than the last generation born before legalization? Hardly. Instead, the first cohort to survive legalized abortion went on the worst youth murder spree in American history.OK. So much for the facts.
All that's left is the callous, shallow and tone-deaf Bennett, someone who just doesn't seem to know when to shut up and go away. Simply stop lecturing us about virtue, once and for all.
P.S. I bet he believed all the stories about murder and mayhem at the Superdome in New Orleans.

Comments
”...[T]he acid test of Levitt’s theory is this: did the first New, Improved Generation culled by legalized abortion actually grow up to be more lawful teenagers than the last generation born before legalization?”
I believe that Levitt’s theory was only that there were fewer unlawful teenagers as a result of fewer unwanted children being born. His supporting statistical analysis is compelling. Only the soulless would extrapolate that finding to a crime-fighting technique.
And Bennett’s sanctimony must go right to the bone if he, of all people, can’t understand sex as a recreational activity or the failure, on occasion, to make considerate choices.
But I guess that is the sort of primitive reasoning you should expect from “conservative intellectuals”.
Posted by: shep
|
September 29, 2005 10:31 AM
"I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down."
Oh, and Levitt said nothing about race. Under the present circumstances, I could suggest that if you aborted every Republican baby, the crime rate might also go down. Certainly our politics and discourse would be markedly improved.
Posted by: shep
|
September 29, 2005 11:39 AM
Bennett's statement would be markedly improved - and completely accurate - if he had left out the word black. Tone-deaf doesn't begin to describe it. He has an important point which is lost. Remember forced sterilization? We don't want to go back to that. If he had used that historical example - which was implemented in a decidedly racist fashion - his point would have been stellar. We do not want to argue for or against abortion on the basis of the broader effects on society like the crime rate and the deficit. That's disgustingly immoral.
Yours,
Wince
Posted by: Wince and Nod
|
September 29, 2005 12:58 PM
John Conyers has released an open letter written to the the Salem Radio Network, the network that carries Bennett's program, requesting that they suspend this program and address the problem of stereotyping and profiling that has been expressed on their programming.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/9/29/144328/867
Posted by: Ara Rubyan
|
September 29, 2005 11:24 PM
Where are all those self-righteous prigs who demanded Durbin's apology, and weren't satisfied when he gave it?
Bennett hasn't and won't apologise, and his defenders are already on the attack.
No sense of decency whatsoever.
Posted by: Mark Adams
|
September 30, 2005 06:15 PM
Durbin's apology was as satisfying as getting a handjob via email.
Posted by: Rosemary, The Queen of All Evil
|
September 30, 2005 06:25 PM
I don't want to know about your personal life, Ro.
re: Bennett, I've thought about it and changed my opinion. I believe Bennett did the nation a service. Now we know what it means to be a compassionate conservative.
Posted by: Ara Rubyan
|
September 30, 2005 09:21 PM