I favor the separation of Church and War
Cartoons are published that certain Muslims find offensive. A conflagration erupts. And we're asked to choose up sides -- "Is Islam a peaceful religion or not?"
Sorry, but I can't accept that frame.
But I do have an opinion on this. Here it is:
Let me begin by saying I believe in God. Simply put, I'm what most of you would call a religious (or spiritual) person. It's how I was raised; it's how I've tried to live my life; it's what I've tried to teach my own children.
But there have been enough wars fought in God's name. Enough. Who needs another one? By making this about "Islam," we're also implicitly making this about "Christianity." And, God knows, "Judaism" has been dragged into this too.
You might disagree, but that's what I think.
Now, let me make myself clear: I'm quite familiar with the notion of totalitarianism. I understand that it is the antithesis of freedom and liberty. And to the extent that I, as an American, value the constitutional notion of inalienable rights, I am against any totalitarian entity that seeks to quash my (or anyone else's) human rights.
But the religions I'm familiar with (Christianity, Judaism, Islam) are also, in their own way, the antithesis of freedom and liberty. The Bible, the Torah, the Koran -- they teach that we should follow God's commandments. They teach that we should bend to God's will. Not that it's a bad thing; just the opposite, in fact.
But if we, as Americans, are truly comitted to government of the people, for the people and by the people we must put our Constitution at the highest level in our system of temporal laws.
As Justice O'Connor so famously put it:
At a time when we see around the world the violent consequences of the assumption of religious authority by government, Americans may count themselves fortunate: Our regard for constitutional boundaries has protected us from similar travails, while allowing private religious exercise to flourish. … Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: Why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly.In short, I wish we'd stop arguing about whether this is, or isn't about Islam or Christianity or Judaism. More to the point, I wish our highest government officials were smart enough not to fall into that trap.
I prefer to keep church and state separate. I prefer to keep church and military separate. And I most certainly prefer to keep church and war separate.
And if I'm the only one who believes that, then that's perfectly fine with me.
4 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: I favor the separation of Church and War.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.rubyan.com/mt4/backtrack.cgi/694
Our occasional linkfest giving you some intriguing reading from weblogs of MANY different viewpoints. Viewpoints expressed do not necessarily reflect the... Read More
Our occasional linkfest giving you some intriguing reading from weblogs of MANY different viewpoints. Viewpoints expressed do not necessarily reflect the... Read More
Our occasional linkfest giving you some intriguing reading from weblogs of MANY different viewpoints. Viewpoints expressed do not necessarily reflect the... Read More
Our occasional linkfest giving you some intriguing reading from weblogs of MANY different viewpoints. Viewpoints expressed do not necessarily reflect the... Read More
You ever notice how we're always taught that there are two things that you must never discuss in polite company -- politics and religion?
Too bad for us because, today, these two intertwined issues turn out to be what everything else revolves around.
You don’t talk about politics and religion because it usually leads to bad feelings. I think that that’s because both of these social institutions relate to tribal affiliation (belonging and ego self-identification) and people’s fear of how their lives will be controlled by outside forces.
Even though religion has always been used to control politics (and vise versa), when it comes to the conflict part – for protesting Muslims or for whining Christians – it’s far more about (us and them) politics than it is about religion (hint: hate speech, violence and war aren’t religious activities).
“American Firsters and the "My God is a better God than your God" crowd need someone to hate. How can they go through the day chanting "we're number one" if they don't have someone in second place to look down upon? Thus we move from interning the Japanese to hating communists and, with the decline of the Cold War, to turning inward on gays and, of course, the handy all-purpose hatred of African-Americans that never goes out of style. Hating the French was just a brief fling, like an old girlfriend that you call from time to time because you know she puts out, Now it's the Muslims because they fit all of our daily minimum requirements for chest-beating hatred. They're brown, they not Christian, and they don't necessarily agree that our way is the way that they want to live their lives. Invading their countries, occupying their land and killing them seems to piss them off too.
”The people who are so all fired up about the riots couldn't care less about freedom of speech; just ask them about Ted Rall or Tom Toles. This is just a button that they want to push to provoke a people that they hate because it confirms every wet dream they have ever had about their own superior way of life.”
http://tbogg.blogspot.com/2006/02/brief-response-i-dont-want-to-get-in.html