Dear Spineless Democrats
by shep
Listen very carefully to what this woman is saying.
Or get punked by Lou Dobbs and Pat Buchanan, I’m not really sure I give a shit anymore.
This page shows all the posts for the "Immigration reform" Category from E Pluribus Unum
The most current posts are on the main page.
by shep
Listen very carefully to what this woman is saying.
Or get punked by Lou Dobbs and Pat Buchanan, I’m not really sure I give a shit anymore.
Asked by a reporter yesterday about his use of Community Lawn Service with a Heart, Romney, who was hosting the Republican Governors Association conference in Miami, said, "Aw, geez," and walked away.Brilliant comeback, Governor!
Interesting polling analysis on the politics of immigration reform:
A USA TODAY breakdown of public opinion, based on Gallup polls taken in April and May, finds Americans falling into four clusters that are roughly equal in size but vary dramatically in point of view. The groups can be characterized as "hard-liners," "unconcerned," "ambivalent" and "welcoming."
[Bush's] plan won't work, and it is not seriously meant to work. It's supposed to look dramatic and buy the president some respite from negative polls - and then it is supposed to fail, strengthening the administration's case for its truly preferred approach: amnesty + guestworkers.I'd agree except I'd take it even further: this plan fits the profile of most of Bush's presidency -- do such a bad job of governing so as to prove that government itself is bad.
Sorry, I was watching my Pistons get outplayed by the Caviliers in the second round of the NBA playoffs.
Oh yeah, that's right -- Bush gave a speech immigration reform. Tom Shales has the story.
Update:
Apparently, there's some chatter on the right about impeaching the president for being too soft on illegal immigrants. It's hard to believe, but some folks out there think Bush isn't enough of a caudillo.Heh.
Bush addresses the nation tonight on the need for sending the National Guard to stop illegal aliens from entering the US.
This is a major, major political problem for the White House. The measures which Bush's base demands, the ones necessary to really satisfy them -- a huge wall and active deportation -- are far too extreme for Bush to embrace. And yet they aren't going to be satisfied without extreme measures.The media loves to talk about how Democrats are being harmed because "the Left" of the party is dragging it towards policies which are too extreme, but the reality is that dynamic is taking place within, and is threatening to drown, the Republican Party.
Bush has very few supporters left. The few he has left are demanding that he adopt immigration positions which he clearly opposes and which would alienate most people in the country. And he is far too weak to satisfy them with symbolic measures.
They are actually debating his impeachment over this issue. What is a 29% President to do?
As faithful watchers of The West Wing know, the incoming President has 18 months, tops, to get anything done. So his/her campaign has to focus on what that is -- and leave the rest for later.
That said, I was interested to see this list of issues that Democrats in Blogville have reached consensus on.
Scan the list and tell me -- which one of these you would campaign on?
I think the "liberal netroots" does have a fairly clear consensus on a number of issues. I'm not going to claim every liberal blogger or blog reader agress with everything on this list - that'd be ridiculous - but nonetheless I'd say there's a pretty obvious general consensus on the following:I'm sure I could think of a few more things. I left off foreign policy because I find that most people who write about it imagine they're playing the game of Risk. It's nice to have nice bumpersticker doctrines which are ultimately meaningless, but basically "put grownups in charge" is my prescription. Kick the petulant children out.
- Undo the bankruptcy bill enacted by this administration
- Repeal the estate tax repeal
- Increase the minimum wage and index it to the CPI
- Universal health care (obviously the devil is in the details on this one)
- Increase CAFE standards. Some other environment-related regulation
- Pro-reproductive rights, getting rid of abstinence-only education, improving education about and access to contraception including the morning after pill, and supporting choice. On the last one there's probably some disagreement around the edges (parental notification, for example), but otherwise.
- Simplify and increase the progressivity of the tax code
- Kill faith-based funding. Certainly kill federal funding of anything that engages in religious discrimination.
- Reduce corporate giveaways
- Have Medicare run the Medicare drug plan
- Force companies to stop underfunding their pensions. Change corporate bankruptcy law to put workers and retirees at the head of the line with respect to their pensions.
- Leave the states alone on issues like medical marijuana. Generally move towards "more decriminalization" of drugs, though the details complicated there too.
- Imprison Jeff Goldstein for crimes against humanity for his neverending stupidity
- Paper ballots
- Improve access to daycare and other pro-family policies. Obiously details matter.
- Raise the cap on wages covered by FICA taxes.
...adding a few more things which would be obvious if we weren't living in the Grand and Glorious Age of Bush:
...oh, and I meant to include:
- Torture is bad
- Imprisoning citizens without charges is bad
- Playing Calvinball with the Geneva Conventions and treaties generally is bad
- Imprisoning anyone indefinitely without charges is bad
- Stating that the president can break any law he wants any time "just because" is bad
- Marriage rights for all, which includes "gay marriage" and quicker transition to citizenship for the foreign spouses of citizens.
"Day labor is not a niche market," said Abel Valenzuela, a professor at the University of California at Los Angeles and one of three authors of the first national day-labor study, which was released in January. "It's now entering different aspects of the national mainstream economy."Forty-nine percent of day labor employers are homeowners, according to 2,660 laborers interviewed for the study. Contractors were second, at 43 percent. The study also found that three quarters of day laborers were illegal immigrants and most were from Latin America.
Day laborers like homeowners, too. Shady contractors routinely stiff them. Not homeowners -- the workers know where they live.
More on Iran below. But first this write-up from Ron Brownstein:
By a solid 2-1 margin, those surveyed said they would prefer such a comprehensive approach [to immigration reform], which a bipartisan group of senators has proposed, to an enforcement-only strategy, which the House of Representatives approved in December. Support for a comprehensive approach was about the same among Democrats, independents and Republicans, the poll found.And Doyle McManus has the story on Iran:[...]
Although President Bush's job approval rating was essentially unchanged from his 38% showing last month, the new poll found Democrats opening double-digit leads on the key measures of voters' early preferences for the November balloting.
[...]
Democrats lead Republicans 49% to 35% among registered voters who were asked which party they intended to support in their congressional districts this fall. When registered voters were asked which party they hoped would control the House and Senate after the midterm election, 51% picked the Democrats and 38% the GOP.
Americans are divided over the prospect of U.S. military action against Iran if the government in Tehran continues to pursue nuclear technology — and a majority do not trust President Bush to make the "right decision" on that issue, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.
Two headlines:
Bush Blames Reid for bill's failure
...and:
More than 1 million expected to participate in protests across US
Heh. Do you think they're protesting Harry Reid's intransigence? Nope. They're protesting the House Republican version of "immigration reform," a bill Reid is against and Bush is ... well, what the hell IS Bush for anymore except saving his own hide?
P.S. The collapse of the Senate immigration bill and the collapse of the House Budget bill are examples of what happens when a President's approval rating falls to all-time lows.
P.S.S. From The Note:
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) will address the DC rally on the National Mall at 4:30 pm ET. He is expected to address head-on the enforcement-only immigration bill passed by the House. Sen. Kennedy will be joined by AFL-CIO President John Sweeney and other labor leaders.Remember back when Karl Rove had super-powers?Sen. Kennedy is expected to tell the crowd that the Republican House bill is wrong because it will make America less secure.
Kevin Drum pieces it together and it makes more sense than anything else I've read so far.
Summary:
When someone [Frist] has suckered you [Reid] enough times, you demand guarantees before you'll make another deal with him. If all you get is sweet talk, you know the fix is in and you walk away. Reid walked away, and it was the right thing to do.
"The income gap between the United States and Mexico is the largest between any two contiguous countries in the world," writes Stanford historian David Kennedy. That huge disparity is producing massive demand in the United States and massive supply from Mexico and Central America.Whenever governments try to come between these two forces -- think of drugs -- simply increasing enforcement does not work. Tighter border control is an excellent idea, but to work, it will have to be coupled with some recognition of the laws of supply and demand -- that is, it will have to include expansion of the legal immigrant pool.
[Note: Great minds think alike.]
Beyond the purely economic issue, however, there is the much deeper one that defines America -- to itself, to its immigrants and to the world. How do we want to treat those who are already in this country, working and living with us? How do we want to treat those who come in on visas or guest permits? These people must have some hope, some reasonable path to becoming Americans. Otherwise we are sending a signal that there are groups of people who are somehow unfit to be Americans, that these newcomers are not really welcome and that what we want are workers, not potential citizens. And we will end up with immigrants who have similarly cold feelings about America.
Well, that was the headline in the Washington Times, at any rate. It seemed designed to stoke the resentment of many in the Republican Congress.
Here's the thing: Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has gone on record saying that he would not consider any legislation adopting a "guest worker program" without a majority of the majority voting for it. Got that? A majority of Republicans in the Senate would have to be for the legislation.
Well, he's facing an uphill battle, for sure: the Senate Judiciary committee voted 12-6 in favor of the reform bill...meaning that 4 of the 10 Republicans joined all 8 Democrats...meaning that a majority of the majority was against the bill.
It's enough to make Sen. McCain's head explode -- apparently, the Senator and Charlie Gibson of ABC sparred over whether the bill really did amount to "amnesty." Talk about a wedge issue!
While the guest worker program made it out of committee, many hurdles remain... Hurdle number one is making it onto the Senate floor. Hurdle number two is coming to an agreement with a House of Representatives diametrically opposed to a guest worker program. Hurdle number three will be the White House. It remains unclear if President Bush will support the comprehensive immigration act as passed out of committee today.Yeah, whatever. Don't watch what he says, watch what he does.
And how about them 40,000 students marching in protest on the highways? I understand that was organized by the kids via MySpace.com. Heh.
I'll ask the question again, because I haven't yet been able to get an answer from the frothing nativists among us:Other than crossing the border illegally, is there an epidemic of lawlessness by Hispanic aliens that I'm not aware of?
It seems to me that the majority of "illegals" would want to maintain, shall we say, a low profile. Or, as Bob Dylan once said, "To live outside the law you must be honest."
P.S. I'm an immigrant. IJS.
I admit that the 500 thousand people that showed up to demonstrate in Los Angeles caught me by surprise.
I also admit I haven't followed this debate closely until now.
That said, here's my question: Other than crossing the border illegally, is there an epidemic of lawlessness by Hispanic aliens that I'm not aware of?
Ara Rubyan:
The timing on Clinton's switcheroo is particularly bad. Even if she was lay...
(Dear Spineless Democrats)
shep:
And I bet, if you sourced it, it would turn out to just one more tentacle o...
(They Don’t Understand Psychology Either)
Ara Rubyan:
Excellent.
There's a related strain of political thought that says govern...
(They Don’t Understand Psychology Either)
shep:
She usually does. This was my comment:
You know what this is a...
(Digby nails it)
Ara Rubyan:
Don't forget: Rove was entitled to "THE math" before the '06 midterms. More...
(Effective Disorder)
Ara Rubyan:
You're good! Remind me to double your salary....
(Keith Olbermann, Daniel Levin and Waterboarding)
Ara Rubyan:
<a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/election_2008/2007/11/07/rankin...
(Clinton's “Downturn:” Conventional Wisdom?)
shep:
The barometer for how screwed we are is Bob Somberby writes a somewhat know...
(Clinton's “Downturn:” Conventional Wisdom?)
Ara Rubyan:
Matthews citing [Hillary's] “bizarre behavior” is like a ch...
(Clinton's “Downturn:” Conventional Wisdom?)
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.