On Hillary Clinton
What's wrong with this picture?
- In head to head national polling, she does worse against the top-tier Republican candidates than the other top-tier Democratic candidates.
- Her disapproval numbers are higher than any other top-tier Dem candidate.
- The percentage of people that say they would definitely not vote for her (if she was the Dem nominee) is above 50%.
- Barack Obama has raised more money than her.
Posted by Ara | Link
| Comments
(3)
| digg this
| del.icio.us 
Categories: 2008 Presidential Election
, Hillary Clinton
Comments
Are you kidding? She's a corporatist hawk. It would be good to have an actual liberal as the Demcratic nominee. Honestly, I have no idea whether Obama is but he's a better bet than Clinton. So are Edwards and Dodd.
Run Al, run!
Posted by: shep![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.rubyan.com/politics/nav-commenters.gif)
|
July 2, 2007 11:45 AM
That's what I've been saying for a year now. If anything, her negative numbers have grown if not solidified.
Posted by: Mark Adams![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.rubyan.com/politics/nav-commenters.gif)
|
July 2, 2007 09:13 PM
Yeah, but here's the thing Mark: I know that the one with the most money doesn't always win the nomination -- just ask President Dean.
But what silver lining is there in the fact that Edwards' fundraising is slowing down, not gaining momentum?
Posted by: Ara Rubyan![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.rubyan.com/politics/nav-commenters.gif)
|
July 3, 2007 08:33 AM