This is an individual post from E Pluribus Unum
There's more on the main page.


Campaigning on Iraq: 3 Strategies

OK, let's say you've got three major Democratic candidates running for their party's nomination for president.

  1. The first one says s/he was mislead by Bush about the war and that while voted to give him the authority to use force, s/he didn't necessarily give him permission to invade Iraq.
  2. The second candidate now says s/he flat-out made a mistake in voting to give the president the authority to use force.
  3. The third candidate says that s/he was against the war from the very start and said so to whomever would listen.
Given that the Iraq war will be the most important issue of the campaign, who are you supporting: Candidate #1, #2, or #3? And why?

Posted by Ara | Link | Comments (3) | digg thisdigg.png | del.icio.us del.icio.us.jpg
Categories: 2008 Election , Democrats , War in Iraq

Comments

Hey, What about the 4th Way?

"I thought the war was important, that it was right and I still support it."

Oh that's right. Lieberman isn't a Democrat anymore.

Posted by: Mark Adams [TypeKey Profile Page] | February 14, 2007 11:48 PM

Sadly, no.

Posted by: Ara Rubyan [TypeKey Profile Page] | February 15, 2007 06:48 AM

For the time being, all of the above.

They are not Republicans.

Posted by: shep [TypeKey Profile Page] | February 15, 2007 09:31 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser

Advertiser

Search


Recent Posts

Full Feed RSS

128px-Feed-icon.svg.png

Creative Commons LicenseThis weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2