Maybe Murtha was right after all
(Updated below)
On Nov. 19, 2005 over a dozen Iraqis were killed in an incident at Haditha. The Marines initially said that they had been killed by a roadside IED and the subsequent crossfire between them and insurgents. But Time magazine later reported that the killings were a deliberate act by US forces. In May of this year, retired Marine Rep. Jack Murtha said that Corps officials told him the Iraqis had been killed in "cold blood." His statements ignited a firestorm of controversy, with various right-wing Bush loyalists accusing him of cowardice, lying, treason and worse.
Now, apparently it turns out that perhaps Murtha was right.
Evidence collected on the deaths of 24 Iraqis in Haditha supports accusations that U.S. Marines deliberately shot the civilians, including unarmed women and children, a Pentagon official said Wednesday.And, in an unfortunate illustration of the cliche that timing is everything, Staff Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich has filed suit in Washington DC today, stating that Murtha "publicly and falsely accused the involved Marines ... of cold-blooded murder and war crimes."
Wonder who's paying this guy's lawyer?
UPDATE: Glenn Greenwald has some more on Wuterich's lawsuit.
Comments
Of course he was right.
Once I saw this, and saw the public non-reaction to it, I knew we had lost everything that mattered, that we had proved to the world the worst al Qaeda had claimed about us.
Murtha is right about something else (just as John Kerry was about Vietnam). It’s all about command leadership and the rules of engagement. Innocent civilians and soldiers killed in combat aren’t the only victims of civilian and military command decisions; they destroy many of our soldiers even if they survive the fight, physically. Then there's the heart, soul and moral authority of the country. RIP.
Posted by: shep | August 3, 2006 11:08 AM